Current:Home > StocksAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Visionary Growth Labs
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-13 19:23:43
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Music program aims to increase diversity in college music departments
- Fuzzy Math: How Do You Calculate Emissions From a Storage Tank When The Numbers Don’t Add Up?
- See Below Deck Sailing Yacht's Gary Tell Daisy About His Hookup With Mads in Awkward AF Preview
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Recovery high schools help kids heal from an addiction and build a future
- Amazon Reviewers Call This Their Hot Girl Summer Dress
- Jennifer Lopez’s Contour Trick Is Perfect for Makeup Newbies
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Where gender-affirming care for youth is banned, intersex surgery may be allowed
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Medications Can Raise Heat Stroke Risk. Are Doctors Prepared to Respond as the Planet Warms?
- In a supreme court race like no other, Wisconsin's political future is up for grabs
- Ulta 24-Hour Flash Deal: Save 50% On a Bed Head Hair Waver That Creates Waves That Last for Days
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Dying Orchards, Missing Fish as Climate Change Fueled Europe’s Record Heat
- 'You forget to eat': How Ozempic went from diabetes medicine to blockbuster diet drug
- Padma Lakshmi Claps Back to Hater Saying She Has “Fat Arms”
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
From Antarctica to the Oceans, Climate Change Damage Is About to Get a Lot Worse, IPCC Warns
These Are the Best Appliances From Amazon for Small Kitchens
Q&A: Plug-In Leader Discusses Ups and Downs of America’s E.V. Transformation
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
California restaurant used fake priest to get workers to confess sins, feds say
Greenland’s Melting: Heat Waves Are Changing the Landscape Before Their Eyes
10 Cooling Must-Haves You Need if It’s Too Hot for You To Fall Asleep